« Paris Hilton is Victim of Identity Theft | Main | Campaign Urges Tourists to Visit Alaska 'B4ITMELTS' »
October 06, 2005
Plan to Make Americans Nine Months Older Gains Ground
If a group of conservative political leaders gets its way,
every American will soon be nine months older than they are today. According to the Truth
in Age Act, currently being debated on Capitol Hill, the lives of
individuals will be dated not from birth but from conception. While the
measure has strong backing from values voters, supporters expect a
tough fight from celebrities, few of whom want to see an additional 9
months tacked onto their ages.
Melanie Griffith, Madonna seen as high-profile opponents of Truth in Age Act.
By Deanna Swift
WASHINGTON, DC—According to his official biography, Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn is 57 years old. But ask the Senator how old he is and you'll get a different answer: 58. That's because Mr. Coburn dates his life not from birth, as is the common practice in America and most of the world, but from the date upon which he was conceived: June 23, 1947.
If it sounds odd, Mr. Coburn and his staff—all of whom have added nine months to their own ages—consider it anything but. "The Senator says that he is 58 years old because he was conceived 58 years ago," says a staff member who asked to remain anonymous, but gives his own age as 37.
| Related Stories |
||
• Christian 'Conception' Parties Raise Ire, Eyebrows |
The Truth in Age Act
In fact, Mr. Coburn and his conservative allies in the Senate feel so strongly about the issue that they will soon introduce a bill that will add nine months to the lives of every single American. The bill, known as the Truth in Age Act, is currently gathering sponsors on Capitol Hill, but already claims as backers some of the marquee names of the pro-family movement: 48-year-old Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, 55-year-old Jim DeMint of South Carolina and 55-year-old George Allen of Virginia.
Needed: a conception certificate
If the bill is enacted into law—something that political insiders say is a 'no-brainer' given today's pro-family climate in Washington—Americans would be required to identify their date of conception or DOC. Proof of 'conception day' will soon be necessary to secure everything from a passport to a Social Security card and a drivers license. Some government agencies say that they're already preparing for the shift away from birth certificates to the new conception certificates.
"Treat it as you would any other form of essential identification," says Marlie Schaeffer, a spokeswoman for the Social Security Administration. "Keep in mind that the certificate of conception has to be an original document. We can't accept photocopies or a document that you've had notarized yourself."
Hallmark shifting toward 'Conception Day' cards
Major makers of birthday cards—62% of the everyday occasion card industry—say that they're already preparing to make the shift to conception cards, as Americans stop celebrating the day they made their first physical appearance on earth and start ringing in the day that a father's sperm and a mother's egg first united. Birthday card giant Hallmark is said to be close to rolling out a new line of Conception Day cards that will replace traditional birthday imagery of cakes and gifts with stylized imagery of spermatozoa and ova.
Documentation difficulties
While initial polls indicate widespread bipartisan enthusiasm for the Truth in Age Act, even supporters admit that documenting their conception date may be difficult for some Americans. Victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, for example, lost many of their documents in the aftermaths of those storms, including their conception data. Lawmakers have signaled that they may be willing to write into the law a temporary exemption for hurricane victims, allowing them to retain their current ages until they are back on their feet.
Celebrity resistance expected
Resistance is also expected from a number of high-profile celebrities including Melanie Griffith, Barbra Streisand and Madonna, aging starlets who are loathe to add an additional nine months onto their already advancing years. Conservative stars, however, are said to be embracing the change. Sources close to Jennifer Aniston say that she is already updating her personal information to reflect her date of conception. "She's not ashamed to say that she was conceived 37 years ago," says a longtime friend to the actress. "She considers that the date that her life began."
October 6, 2005 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454aa8369e200d834230ec353ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Plan to Make Americans Nine Months Older Gains Ground:
» Truth in Age Act from Hamdems
According to the Swift Report, swiftreport Plan to Make Americans Nine Months Older Gains Ground If a group of conservative political leaders gets its way, every American will soon be nine months older than they are today. According to the... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 6, 2005 7:57:35 PM
» Plan to Make Americans Nine Months Older Gains Ground from BoredSheepless
Plan to Make Americans Nine Months Older Gains Ground
... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 7, 2005 4:55:19 AM
» Lunch: 10/11/2005 from Basil's Blog
Try one of these specials with your breakfast: Robert (LLama Butchers) goes domestic. Kaos goes Extreme Makeover crazy. GEBIV (There's One, Only) isn't fulfilling his fantasy. This Bonfire Is Full Of Crap. The Politburo Diktat looks at the origins of [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 11, 2005 11:33:42 AM
» Blastnostricful from NIF
Today's dose of NIF - News, Interesting & Funny ... It's a Kerry-180 Tuesday [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 11, 2005 6:19:45 PM
Comments
Funny stuff. Appreciate your irony and insight. I'm not sure that others who have read your post and commented realized you were writing a parody? Oh well. All good fun. But raises some great questions as seen above in all your feedback. Will add you to my blogroll. Have a good one. lgp
Posted by: Lyn | Oct 11, 2005 4:07:59 PM
Let us not forget, this is just their way to disallow abortion. If you are a human and a citizen at conception, then abortion, even in the first few days or weeks, would be murder - hence, against the law. They will keep trying until they succeed, or are voted out for wasting our time and money with their stupid bullshit.
Posted by: Jr | Oct 9, 2005 1:13:42 AM
I think the question posed by Zach is very interesting. Obviously, any proper woman who is at term can give birth. Nothing special about that.
But sex with the Creator of All Life? Of course that is the most important date to remember.
It's a little known fact that that is the reason most women have difficulty achieving orgasm with mere mortal men. Still, a small price to pay for eternal salvation, I say.
Posted by: Pat Gingrich | Oct 6, 2005 7:09:44 PM
How are we supposed to figure this out, anyway? I know my parents had sex about 18 times a day for the week after they were married, and I was conceived on one of those days--but they're not sure when, as I was both 2 weeks late and born by emergency C-section.
Do we have to log every single time we have sex now? And then count backwards every time the OB gives an approximate age to the fetus? This is absolutely retarded.
Posted by: Orli | Oct 6, 2005 6:53:45 PM
Apart from the total idiocy of this whole concept, not to mention the cost reamifications - amended all forms of identification, etc. - what about people who were born prematurely. Won't they be unfairly aged by a few months? :)
I don't know how some of these idiots in Congress that come up with hairball schemes like this manage to tie their own shoelaces. Surely, there are more important issues for our elected representatives to be focused on.
Posted by: Les Figg | Oct 6, 2005 3:47:29 PM
What if I was conceived today but was frozen as an embryo until I were implanted sixty-five years later?Does this mean I am born at retirement age?
Posted by: Baby Boy | Oct 6, 2005 3:32:07 PM
And what about Christmas? Is the bible wrong now? Or is it more important to celebrate the BIRTH of Jesus vs. the immaculate CONCEPTION which would rob this nine month hokey pokey of any substance. I mean come on, EVERYONE is born, but how many of your parents DIDN'T fuck and you still were spat out...
Posted by: Zach | Oct 6, 2005 3:15:37 PM
what about the American conceived preborns who are actually born in someplace like France. Do we welcome them as fellow Americans or just nuke them at the same time as any other non-Americans?
My kids are excited about celebrating both birthdays and Jimmy Buffet Day (named because in their case, conception logically followed getting drunk and screwing. I think it's a better name than "parent's fuck day" but that's just me.)
Posted by: Newt Robertson | Oct 6, 2005 2:56:50 PM
Another interesting issue arising from this bill is the question of citizenship. For example, I have a friend who was conceived in Canada but born in the U.S. Since her life began in Canada, she should be entitled to Canadian citizenship. Of course, a godless socialist country like Canada is unlikely to give this law much consideration.
Posted by: Josh | Oct 6, 2005 1:29:22 PM
So, instead of "birth day", should I call the new date, in my case around February 18, my "parent's fuck day?"
Posted by: rob huang | Oct 6, 2005 10:17:02 AM

