« Virginia Lawmakers say ‘Virginia’s Not for Lovers Anymore’ | Main | Political Rift Drives Jen and Brad Apart—for Good »

March 24, 2005

Bush Abstinence Plan Pushes 'Virgin Birth'

Virgin_thumbIn his 2006 budget, President Bush is proposing a significant increase in spending on education funding, including curricula that teach teenagers about 'immaculate conception' or 'virgin births' as a cause of pregnancy. The curricula change is a major victory for social conservatives, who have pushed for years to get so-called miraculous gestation included in high-school health text books.

Congressional doctors Weldon, Frist say that they've seen virgin births in their own medical practices

By Hermione Slatkin

Virgin_graphWASHINGTON, DC—If President Bush gets his way, highly regarded abstinence education programs will soon be even more prominent in US high schools. Mr. Bush has proposed that as much as $270 million be spent teaching kids to abstain from sexual activity until they've joined in holy matrimony with a partner of the opposite sex. (Click thumbnail to view graphic.)

In addition to building character in young men and preparing young ladies to experience the two most wonderful, revered days of their lives, abstinence education programs will soon include information on so-called 'miraculous gestation,' or 'virgin birth.'

A famous mother, no father

According to its new official definition, to be included in the glossaries of high-school health textbooks, virgin birth--or IC as it is commonly known--is human conception that occurs not from sexual contact but as a result of divine intervention. While still controversial among members of the medical community, the concept of virgin birth is widely accepted by the population at large. According to a Newsweek poll last year, 79% of Americans believe that the most famous product of virgin birth, Jesus Christ, was born of Mary without a human father.

Virgin_def

Publishers plan to debut the information about 'virgin births' in Texas, the second largest textbook consumer in the country. Last fall, Education officials in Texas successfully petitioned textbook publisher Holt, Rinehart and Winston, to remove discussions of contraception from its books and to redefine marriage as union between a man and a woman.

Virgin_numbersPayoff for the faithful
For social conservatives, who've been pushing for years to get the concept of IC added to the nation's health curricula, news of their latest victory is sweet indeed. While amending the constitution to ban gay marriage remains a top priority for many Christian activists, getting 'virgin births' into the schools is nothing short of a miracle, says Sandy Slokum, executive director of Defend Our Marriages, an Arlington, VA based activist group.

"For decades our young people have been getting an incomplete account of what causes pregnancy," explains Slokum. "It would be like talking about the history of the polio vaccine and not mentioning Jonas Salk or teaching a lesson plan on deaf mutes and failing to mention Helen Keller. When you get right down to it, this is our 'big bang.'

By the book
In December, a Bethlehem, PA, teen announced that she had become pregnant without having intercourse, a claim that was roundly dismissed by doctors. Marissa Meyers, who gave birth to a baby boy on Christmas day, continues to maintain that her pregnancy was the result of divine intervention, and says that the new sex education curricula back up her claim.

"The doctors didn't believe me at all when I told them I hadn't had sex, but now it says like right in a book that you can get pregnant without going all the way," says Ms. Meyers.

Send this page by entering the recipient's e-mail:

March 24, 2005 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/85935/2116410

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bush Abstinence Plan Pushes 'Virgin Birth':

» IMMACULATE CONCEPTIONS TO BE TAUGHT IN SCHOOLS from ThePete.Com
Here's another story from SwiftReport.Blogs.com--the Bush 43 Admin is pushing for Immaculate Conceptions (ICs) to be taught in school--mind you--this isn't just about Jesus--they want kids to learn about immaculate conceptions in general. Here are a f... [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 28, 2005 10:50:18 AM

Comments

The crap spouted in this website is truly unbelievable. It's crackpot views such as the ones expressed as fact here that are making the rest of the word think that America is finally losing the plot.
May common sense win the battle in the fight with religious fundamentalism.

Posted by: michelle | Apr 11, 2006 8:44:29 AM

WHO GIVES A SHIT, AS MOST CHRISTIAN KIDS ARE TAKING IT UP THE ASS SO THEY CAN KEEP THEIR VIRGINITY. lmao!!!
THEN THERE IS NO PROOF THAT jesus EVEN EXISTED.

Posted by: JUST-A-THOUGHT | Mar 28, 2005 2:00:48 AM

Immacuate conception -- look it up in the dictionary, or a Christian or Catholic dictionary. It has nothing to do with the conception of Jesus. It has to do with Mary having been born without original sin. The virgin birth is what people are really referring to, that Jesus was born without Mary and Joe getting it on. But not that sloppy theology is not the theme of our lifetimes. e

Posted by: Eric Francis | Mar 27, 2005 3:17:41 PM

EITHER YOU PEOPLE ARE INSANE OR YOU ARE DRIVING ME MAD. THE HALLUCINATIONS OF THE FUNDAMENTALISTS MUST STAY WITHIN THEIR QUARTERS PLEASE. DON'T INCLUDE THE REST OF US IN THIS HERESY. GOD SAVE YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE TURNING RELIGION INTO SOME KIND OF JOKE.

Posted by: Sally | Mar 27, 2005 2:05:29 PM

Come now, are you so ignorant of Catholic doctrine as to confuse Virgin Birth with Immaculate Conception?

The nature of the Virgin birth is clear, mother but no human father (By the way, the girl who claimed last year to have given virgin birth is insane - what would be God's a plan to do it a second time when His Second coming is of a much different kind?)

But the immaculate conception is totally different. It is the idea that when Mary was conceived by normal sexual means, that she was cleansed of all sin in her mother's womb. So the IC is a claim of Mary's sinlessness, it was about Mary's own conception, not that of her Son

I am no Catholic, so I reject the IC out of hand, but to confuse Virgin Birth with IC is simply ignorant, and for a web site to propound this confusion is to forfeit its right to be taken seriously in matters of religion.

Posted by: Steve Meikle | Mar 27, 2005 12:58:42 PM

Post a comment