« Aircraft Laser Incidents Pinned on Gay Club-Goers | Main | Judge Orders Adulterer Not to Remarry »

January 10, 2005

Politics Caused Brad and Jen Split

Aniston_thumbTinseltown tongues are wagging over rumors that another man may have come in between A-list couple Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston. Pitt's competition wasn't an actor or Hollywood hottie, say insiders, but the most powerful man in the free world: President George W. Bush.

Aniston's embrace of conservative issues said to cause tension

By Russell D'Arby, Arts and Entertainment Correspondent

HOLLYWOOD, CA—Tinseltown tongues are wagging over rumors that another man may have caused the split-up of A-list couple Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston. Pitt's competition wasn't an actor or celeb hottie, say insiders, but President George W. Bush.

Tabloid and glossy mags had been warning of trouble in paradise for months, pointing to Pitt's much publicized desire to start a family and the take-off of former 'Friend' Aniston's silver-screen career. But celeb watchers may have missed a more fundamental division plaguing the couple, say friends of Brad and Jen: their politics.

The couple released a joint statement on Friday announcing that they were separating after nearly five years of marriage.

Aniston: more conservative than you thought

BiorhythmsTension between the two began to escalate, say friends, during the recent presidential campaign when Pitt publicly endorsed democratic contender John Kerry, going so far as to hang a Kerry campaign poster outside of the couple's Hollywood dream home, a gesture that rubbed his glamorous wife the wrong way. "Jen thought that was really disrespectful to the president," a source said. "She made that clear to Brad and it became a really tense situation."

But no amount of behind-the-scenes sweet talking could dissuade Pitt from campaigning for Kerry; the star of Troy and Ocean's Twelve even attended a screening of the Kerry bio-pic "Going Up River: The Long War of John Kerry" at his alma mater, the University of Missouri.

No love for Jen on left coast
Aniston_pitt_kerry_1Aniston was noticeably missing from her hubby's arm at the many democratic love-fests Pitt attended this fall. And while the blonde beauty's publicists laid the blame for her absence on Jen's red-hot movie career—she currently has half a dozen films in the pipeline—sources say it was her lack of enthusiasm for candidate Kerry that kept her off the elite Hollywood party circuit. "Jen is extremely loyal and patriotic," said a source close to the actress. "The way Kerry behaved when he returned from Vietnam really sickened her."

Pitt, 41, and Aniston, 35, began dating in the spring of 1998 and quickly emerged as one of the most watched celebrity couples in Hollywood. They tied the knot in 2000, joined by 200 of their friends as they said "I do" in an extravagant ceremony in Malibu.

But the couple's wedded bliss hit a serious speed bump when hijackers flew commercial airliners into the World Trade Center on September 11. "Brad wasn't sure that we should have gone into Afghanistan," said a source. "Jen strongly disagreed. She thought the situation demanded a strong military response, not a police action like Brad wanted."

Battle of the Hollywood stars
BumperstickersSources say that the couple's problems only escalated during the buildup to the Iraq war. As Pitt joined close friend George Clooney and other members of the liberal Hollywood elite in opposing the war, Aniston confided her unhappiness in a few close friends. But their rocky relationship further unraveled during the presidential campaign. Not long after President George W. Bush's decisive re-election, Aniston removed her wedding ring.

Celebs feel pressure to conform
The couple's announcement that they are splitting up made no mention of their political differences. Sources close to Aniston say that the actress plans to keep her conservative leanings to herself lest they jeopardize her film career in the notoriously liberal bastion that is Hollywood. "Jen saw all of the heat that Mel took after 'Passion' came out," a source said. "I think that helped her decide to keep her politics private."

For now, Pitt and Aniston are asking the public to respect their privacy as they embark on a sensitive and difficult period. Pitt is reportedly considering sitting down with Barbara Walters this spring. Actress Aniston is said to be planning an interview with conservative talk show host Sean Hannity.

Send this page by entering the recipient's e-mail:

January 10, 2005 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/85935/1649548

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Politics Caused Brad and Jen Split:

» Brad and Jen: Aftermath Analysis from Gawker
Truth be told, Gawker HQ is a complete mess right now. Ever since Friday night, when we learned that Brad... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 10, 2005 10:45:45 AM

» Miscellanea - Is Jennifer Aniston a Conservative? from Decision '08
I'm not a celebrity worshiper, and I could care less about what starlet is dating what hunk, but I found this link intriguing, though I have my doubts. After all, this is the same Aniston who was qouted as calling Bush a f***ing idiot (in fairness, p... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 12, 2005 11:26:46 PM

Comments

Right, because everything on the internet is true. Blog owners never, ever make up porkies.

Jennifer Aniston is not a republican. She is a diehard liberal and hates Bush with a passion. She has spoken out against Bush and for the Democrats multiple times, dating back to when Friends first hit it big, and dating to months after she and Brad Pitt split. I am not a fan but I don't believe for one second that a woman who publicly called Bush "a jackass" and "a f***ing idiot" would ever complain about not respecting the president.

Posted by: jane | Jun 11, 2006 2:15:21 AM

I wasn't aware that political differences cause their breakup, but yeah, i couldn't be involved in a relationship with a woman who supports the most hated man in history.

Posted by: Dogwood | Mar 18, 2006 1:43:37 PM

This was freaking hilarious! Thanks!

Posted by: Spaz Cadet | Jun 23, 2005 3:09:41 AM

Wow. This is a speculative article with no verifiable truth to it and already you’re ready to name call and condescend to Ms. Aniston over her rumored political leanings? According to this story it was her soon-to-be ex-husbands very public political views that caused tension. Yet you waste no time, and without any credible evidence to suggest that Jennifer Aniston needs to “grow up.” How childish.

Posted by: James | Jun 22, 2005 10:24:31 PM

it's the end of the world as we know it... Aniston's a Divorced Greek Conservative Bush Lover? I weep for the Future.

Posted by: PopMuse.com | Jun 22, 2005 3:22:20 PM

it's the end of the world as we know it... Aniston's a Divorced Greek Conservative Bush Lover? I weep for the Future.

Posted by: PopMuse.com | Jun 22, 2005 3:22:20 PM

C'mon, are you serious? I call bullshit in a big way. Just look at the regurgitated republican talking points: "Brad wasn't sure that we should have gone into Afghanistan," said a source. "Jen strongly disagreed. She thought the situation demanded a strong military response, not a police action like Brad wanted."

Then it goes on to say that Barbara Walters will interview Brad Pitt and Shawn Hannity will interview Aniston, but Aniston wants to keep a low profile on her political leanings? Bullshit. I called it first.

Posted by: Reality | Jun 22, 2005 2:58:44 PM

So "the way John Kerry when he returned from Vietnam really sickened her."? How old was Jennifer Aniston at the time John Kerry returned from Vietnam -- two?

If Ms. Aniston had any sense of the historic, of civic process, of the contagion of ideas, of social movement, she might have observed that John Kerry was far, far, far from alone in his views those many years ago and that it was the actions of him and those like him who helped bring that war to a close.

I can understand her objection to her husband usurping the right to put a sign supporting "his" candidate on "their" house. It's pretty nervy, especially if she has strong political views of her own.

But to object to the sign because "it's disrespectful to the president" assumes that we should all honor the man who holds the office just because he holds the office, a perfectly galling position promulgated by Karl Rove and the rest of the hypocritical Bush neo-cons. It is a position familiar to anyone whose run up against a dictatorship or against any Republican president since Gerald Ford.

Jennifer Aniston may wrap herself in a flag, rather than think beyond the end of her nose, but there is no excuse for such a shallow and babyish grasp of the democracic process at her age. It's time she grew up and read a book.

Posted by: patty | Mar 31, 2005 3:47:09 PM

Post a comment